Chidi N. Anunka v. Joan Campbell
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Anunka v. Campbell (Supreme Court of the United States 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Chidi N. Anunka appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. *476 § 1983 action as time-barred. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree that the complaint was filed after the expiration of the applicable six-year limitations period, see Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989); Berg v. Groschen, 437 N.W.2d 75, 77 (Minn.Ct.App. 1989), and that the circumstances did not justify equitable tolling, see Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 269, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985); Ochs v. Streater, Inc., 568 N.W.2d 858, 860 (Minn.Ct.App. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The HONORABLE JOHN R. TUNHEIM, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE FRANKLIN L. NOEL, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.