Rose Anderson v. AR Dept. Human Svcs.
Rose Anderson v. AR Dept. Human Svcs.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________
No. 01-1337 ___________
Rose Anderson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Human * Services, Division of Mental Health * [UNPUBLISHED] Services/Arkansas State Hospital, a * public body; Charles Smith, an * individual; Carol Wyrick, an * individual; * * Appellees, * * Annie McGuire, an indivudual, * * Defendant. * ___________
Submitted: October 26, 2001 Filed: October 26, 2001 ___________
Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. ___________
PER CURIAM.
In this appeal following an adverse jury verdict in her retaliation and race discrimination action, Rose Anderson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. After careful consideration of the record before us and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we find the appeal meritless and affirm the judgment of the District Court,1 because there is no basis whatsoever for upsetting the jury’s verdict.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished