United States v. Elmer Duran-Varela

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
United States v. Elmer Duran-Varela, 20 F. App'x 575 (8th Cir. 2001)

United States v. Elmer Duran-Varela

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elmer Duran-Varela pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation after conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and the district court 1 sentenced him to 41 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and filed a brief arguing that Duran-Vare-la should have received a downward departure because his previous aggravated felony conviction for aggravated battery was not serious.

The district court’s decision was clearly an exercise of discretion not to depart under the circumstances in this case. The court’s decision is therefore unreviewable. See United States v. Orozco-Rodriguez, 220 F.3d 940, 942 (8th Cir. 2000).

Moreover, following our independent review, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The HONORABLE RICHARD G. KOPF, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Elmer DURAN-VARELA, Appellant
Status
Unpublished