Armstrong v. Missouri

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit January 5, 2001

Armstrong v. Missouri, 1 F. App'x 555 (8th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

(UNPUBLISHED)

PER CURIAM.

Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing without prejudice his pro se civil rights complaint against numerous defendants. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®, (ii); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988); Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.2d 1334, 1337 (8th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charles ARMSTRONG v. State of MISSOURI Mel Carnahan, Governor St. Louis County, Missouri Buzz Westfall, County Executive St. Louis County Government City of Vinita Park Virginia Bira, Mayor of Vinita Park, Missouri Daniel B. Kramer, Vinita Park, Missouri, Municipal Court Judge R. Hartz, Vinita Park, Missouri, City Marshall Richard Aites, Vinita Park, Missouri Police Officer Unknown Mudd, Vinita Park, Missouri Police Officer Unknown Vinita Park, Missouri, City Court Ku Klux Klan, Overland, Missouri Ku Klux Klan, of the State of Missouri
Status: Published