Armstrong v. Missouri

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit January 5, 2001

Armstrong v. Missouri, 1 F. App'x 559 (8th Cir. 2001)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Charles Armstrong appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his pro se civil rights complaint against multiple defendants. After careful review of the record, we conclude that Mr. Armstrong’s complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)®, (ii); Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2), (e)(1); Bray v. Alexandria Women’s Health Clinic, 506 U.S. 263, 267-68, 113 S.Ct. 753, 122 L.Ed.2d 34 (1993); West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250,101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charles ARMSTRONG v. State of MISSOURI Mel Carnahan City of Vinita Park Virginia Bira Vinita Park Police Department 911 Emergency System of St. Louis County Robert Hartz Richard Aites St. Louis County St. Louis County Correctional/Justice Department Center and Jail Personnel the 21st Judicial Circuit of Missouri
Status: Published