United States v. Lo Van
United States v. Lo Van
Opinion of the Court
Chim Lo Van appeals the 100-month sentence the district court
Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not err in sentencing Lo Van, as his sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum prison term for possessing with intent to distribute an unspecified amount of methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C); United States v. Aguayo-Delgado, 220 F.3d 926, 933 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 600, 148 L.Ed.2d 513 (2000).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The HONORABLE LAWRENCE L. PIER-SOL, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.