Suzanne Schmidt brought a Title VII case against Dayton Hudson, Inc., asserting claims of hostile work environment, retaliation, and constructive discharge. The District Court 1 granted summary judgment in favor of Dayton Hudson. Schmidt appeals, arguing that the evidence in the summary-judgment record shows various disputed issues of material fact that preclude summary judgment.

Having reviewed the record de novo in light of the briefs and oral arguments and applying well-established summary-judgment standards, we are satisfied the District Court correctly ruled that Dayton Hudson was entitled to summary judgment. We conclude that as a matter of law Schmidt has failed to make a case for trial on any of her claims. Finding no flaw in the District Court’s thorough and well-reasoned memorandum and order, we affirm the final judgment entered by that court against Schmidt and in favor of Dayton Hudson. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.