South Dakota inmate Clayton S. Creek appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. *251 §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the only named defendants-the South Dakota Department of Corrections and the South Dakota State Penitentiary-are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity from Creek’s suit. See P.R. Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139, 144, 113 S.Ct. 684, 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion.

A true copy.