Camilo Benitez-Medina pleaded guilty to the offense of conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (2000). The District Court 1 found that Benitez-Medina was an organizer and leader of the charged conspiracy. Accordingly, the court imposed a four-level enhancement of Benitez-Medina’s offense level pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3Bl.l(a) (2000) (providing for four-level enhancement where defendant “was an organizer or leader of a criminal activity that involved five or more participants or was otherwise extensive”), resulting in a sentence of 180 months’ imprisonment.

Benitez-Medina appeals only the four-level sentencing enhancement, arguing that the District Court’s finding regarding his role in the conspiracy is clearly erroneous. We disagree. The evidence presented at the sentencing hearing is sufficient to support specific findings that there were five or more participants in the undertaking; that Benitez-Medina exercised decision-making authority and control over one or more of them; and that he set the price of the methamphetamine, recruited participants, and was entitled to a larger share of the fruits of the drag-distribution scheme than his co-conspirators. Given this evidence, we cannot say the challenged finding is clearly erroneous.

The sentence imposed by the District Court is affirmed.