Tom Rodgers appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. 2 We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Mr. Rodgers’s complaint without prejudice after he failed to comply with a court order. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(b); Edgington v. Missouri Dep’t of Corr., 52 F.3d 777, 779-80 (8th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.