Gerry DuBose appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his civil complaint. After careful de novo review, we agree with the district court’s conclusion that DuBose’s complaint did not state a cause of action actionable in federal court. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Du-Bose’s motion for leave to amend his complaint, or in the denial of his postjudgment motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.