Johnson v. Loftin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit January 2, 2002

Johnson v. Loftin, 23 F. App'x 624 (8th Cir. 2002)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Clyde Johnson appeals from the district court’s1 28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree with the district court that dismissal was warranted. See City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 385, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989); Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 325, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name: Clyde JOHNSON v. Davis Henry LOFTIN, Attorney at Law Public Defenders Office
Status: Published