Yancey v. City of St. Louis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit October 18, 2002

Yancey v. City of St. Louis, 48 F. App'x 228 (8th Cir. 2002)

Opinion of the Court

*229[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Marie Yancey brought suit against defendants on several legal theories, alleging discrimination arising from her employment with the City of St. Louis. Defendants (with the exception of Michael Donate, who prevailed at trial) appeal the judgment entered by the District Court2 on a jury verdict in Yancey’s favor. Yancey cross-appeals the denial of her motions for injunctive relief, promotion, front-pay, prejudgment interest, and supplemental attorney fees and costs. We have eonsidered the record in light of the arguments of both parties. Finding no reversible error, and concluding that an opinion in this fact-intensive case would lack significant precedential value, we summarily affirm the District Court in all respects. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Reference

Full Case Name: Marie YANCEY, Plaintiff—Appellee v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, a Municipal corporation Leonard J. Griggs, Jr., Director of Airport Authority for City of St. Louis in his individual and official capacities Patrick Martocci, Personnel Manager, St. Louis City Airport Authority, in his individual and official capacities, Defendants—Appellants, Michael DONATT, Communications Manager for the City of St. Louis Airport Authority in his individual and official capacities, Defendant Marie Yancey, Plaintiff—Appellant v. City of St. Louis, a Municipal corporation Leonard J. Griggs, Jr., Director of Airport Authority for City of St. Louis in his individual and official capacities Patrick Martocci, Personnel Manager, St. Louis City Airport Authority, in his individual and official capacities Michael Donatt, Communications Manager for the City of St. Louis Airport Authority in his individual and official capacities, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published