[UNPUBLISHED]

Willie E. Clark, a federal inmate, appeals from the district court’s 1 order of involuntary commitment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245. We affirm.

We conclude that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Mr. Clark suffers from a mental disease or defect for which he requires care and treatment in a suitable facility. The report of the government’s expert — which was uncontradicted by any evidence submitted on Mr. Clark’s behalf — satisfied the government’s burden of proof. See United States v. Steil, 916 F.2d 485, 487 (8th Cir. 1990) (standard of review); 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d) (burden of proof). Mr. Clark’s Sixth Amendment ineffective-assistance argument is misplaced in this section 4245 proceeding, see United States v. Veltman, 9 F.3d 718, 720-21 (8th Cir. 1993) (right to counsel in § 4245 proceedings is statutory), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1044, 114 S.Ct. 1572, 128 L.Ed.2d 216 (1994); and in any event, Mr. Clark has not shown that counsel performed deficiently.

Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We also deny Mr. Clark’s pending motions.

A true copy.