On appeal, Robert Robinson contends the district court’s * finding that Robinson shall be committed for mental health treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245 is clearly erroneous. Robinson’s counsel has filed a brief in support of Robinson’s contention and requests permission to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although Robinson was granted permission to file a pro se supplemental brief, he has not done so.

After review of counsel’s Anders brief along with our independent review of the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal. We thus affirm the judgment of the district court, deny as moot Robinson’s pro se motions for discovery and for transcripts at government expense, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

A true copy.