U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2003

John P. Murphy v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass

John P. Murphy v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided April 14, 2003 · Melloy, Fagg, Smith
61 F. App'x 314

John P. Murphy v. Sheryl Ramstad Hvass

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John P. Murphy appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court, and that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying Murphy’s motions to amend his complaint and to compel discovery. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Murphy’s pending motion.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.