Roseann Gottschalk v. Jo Anne Barnhart
Opinion
Roseann B. Gottschalk appeals the judgment of the district court ** affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On appeal, Gottschalk challenges the findings of the administrative law judge (ALJ) that (1) she retained the ability to perform unskilled work, and (2) her subjective complaints were not fully credible. After careful review, we reject both of these arguments and conclude substantial evidence on the record as a whole, and in particular the findings of a consulting mental health pro *1001 fessional, supported the ALJ’s determination Gottschalk was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. See Cunningham v. Apfel, 222 F.3d 496, 500 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
The Honorable Bobby E. Shepherd, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Roseann B. GOTTSCHALK, Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished