Kendrick Epping appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 10-month prison term and an additional 26-month supervised-release term, upon revocation of his supervised release from a bank robbery conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court instead should have imposed inpatient treatment.

*609 After careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was within the limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.