Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Carol v. Stephens v. Estate of Ulmer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Carol v. Stephens v. Estate of Ulmer, 76 F. App'x 112 (8th Cir. 2003)
Riley, Hansen, Smith

Carol v. Stephens v. Estate of Ulmer

Opinion

*113 PER CURIAM.

Carol Stephens appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her civil action against the Estate of Raymond Clifford Ulmer. After de novo review, see Charchenko v. City of Stillwater, 47 F.3d 981, 982-83 (8th Cir. 1995), we conclude that the district court properly dismissed Stephens’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We decline to address the issues Stephens raises for the first time on appeal. See Alexander v. Pathfinder, Inc., 189 F.3d 735, 742 (8th Cir. 1999).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Reference

Full Case Name
Carol Vanerka STEPHENS, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF Raymond Clifford ULMER, Deceased, Appellee
Status
Unpublished
↑