Donald Nangle v. Kathy Surratt-States
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Seaver v. New Buffalo Auto Sales (In re Hecker) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Eighth Circuit 2013)
- Duane Yates v. Wil L. Forker (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Eighth Circuit 2004)
- Yates v. Forker (In re Patriot Co.) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Eighth Circuit 2004)
- Susan Manchester v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Tenth Circuit 2015)
- Manchester v. Funderburgh (In re Funderburgh) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Tenth Circuit 2015)
- Peoples v. Radloff (In re Peoples) (8th Cir. 2014)
- Colleen Powers v. Odyssey Capital Group, LLC (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Eighth Circuit 2009)
- In re: Vernetta Vivian Watson (United States District Court, Nebraska 2020)
- In re Remington Park Owners Ass'n (United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia 2016)
- Powers v. Odyssey Capital Group, LLC (In re Mesaba Aviation, Inc.) (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Eighth Circuit 2009)
- GMGRSST, Ltd. v. Menotte (In re Air Safety International, L.C.) (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Debtor Donald Nangle (Nangle) appeals from a bankruptcy appellate panel order concluding, alternatively, Nangle lacked standing to appeal the bankruptcy court’s 1 *142 order approving a settlement. Upon de novo review, see Park v. Forest Serv., 205 F.3d 1034,1036 (8th Cir. 2000), we conclude that while Nangle had standing to object in the bankruptcy court to the settlement agreement, see Fed. R. Bankr.P.2002(a)(3); In re Thompson, 965 F.2d 1136, 1140 (1st Cir. 1992), he lacked standing to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order approving the settlement, because he could not show he has a pecuniary interest in the order, see In re Marlar, 252 B.R. 743, 748 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2000) (party ordinarily has no standing to appeal unless party can show basis for arguing that challenged action caused him cognizable injury, i.e., party was aggrieved by order) aff'd, 267 F.3d 749 (8th Cir. 2001); Spenlinhauer v. O’Donnell, 261 F.3d 113, 117-19 (1st Cir. 2001) (standing to appeal from bankruptcy court order requires showing that challenged order directly and adversely affects appellant’s pecuniary interests).
Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Barry S. Schermer, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.