U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2003

Savior v. McGuire

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided April 22, 2003 · Arnold, Bye, Riley

61 F. App'x 318

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Zarn v. Minnesota Department of Human Services (D. Minn. 2022)
Smith v. Olmsted County Sheriff's Department (D. Minn. 2022)
Savior v. McGuire (Supreme Court of the United States 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Ole Savior appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint. Having care*319fully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Mr. Savior failed to state a First Amendment claim, see Hudgens v. NLRB, 424 U.S. 507, 513, 96 S.Ct. 1029, 47 L.Ed.2d 196 (1976), and that the remainder of his complaint did not state any viable federal claim. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing any pending state-law claims. See Labickas v. Ark. State Univ., 78 F.3d 333, 334-35 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 968, 117 S.Ct. 395, 136 L.Ed.2d 310 (1996). The court also did not abuse its discretion in denying Mr. Savior’s motion to reconsider.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.