Leonel Garcia-Garibay appeals the sentence the district court * imposed after Garicia-Garibay pleaded guilty to drug violations under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846. Garcia-Garibay argues he should be resentenced because defense counsel was inef *546 fective for failing to file a timely motion to suppress evidence of methamphetamine seized during the search of Gareia-Garibay’s home. We conclude this ineffective-assistance claim should be brought, if at all, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See United States v. Hughes, 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003). Consequently, we affirm the judgment of the district court.