In this direct criminal appeal, Michael Curry (Curry) challenges as excessive the 9-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed following revocation of Curry’s supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that Curry’s revocation sentence is well below the maximum imprisonment term authorized by statute, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines policy statements, and is not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.