Shelby Baccus appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed following revocation of his supervised release. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that Baccus’s revocation sentence does not exceed the maximum prison term authorized by statute, is within the range recommended by the Sentencing Guidelines policy statements, and does not reflect an abuse of discretion. See United States v. *724 Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review).

The judgment is affirmed. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.