Russell Ralph appeals the district court’s 1 orders denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4) motions. Ralph argued that his 1994 criminal judgment was void and that the district court could not issue its ruling by writing on the face of his pleadings. Having reviewed the record, we find no abuse of discretion by the district court. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988) *722 (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.