Cordell Sawyer appeals the district court’s * denial of Sawyer’s 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) motion to terminate supervision. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors, see id., and thus did not abuse its discretion, see United States v. Jeanes, 150 F.3d 483, 484 (5th Cir. 1998) (recognizing § 3583(e)(1) confers broad discretion on district court). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.