Brian Rohrick appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 14-month prison term upon revocation of his supervised release for a felon-in-possession conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court abused its discretion in imposing additional imprisonment and instead should have imposed inpatient drug treatment or *187 at least a sentence within the Guidelines suggested range.

After a careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was well below the maximum sentence allowed under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Jasper, 338 F.3d 865, 867 (8th Cir. 2003); United States v. Rodriguez-Favela, 337 F.3d 1020, 1021 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.