Aaron Gonzalez (Gonzalez) appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to participating in a drug conspiracy, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Gonzalez argues that the two felony convictions upon which the court relied to classify him as a career offender did not qualify as convictions under U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l(a), because the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services had issued certificates for both convictions that showed he had been “discharged” and “restored all [his] civil rights as provided by law.” In support of this argument, Gonzalez analogizes his case to United States v. Gallaher, 275 F.3d 784 (9th Cir. 2001), where a divided panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that (1) if a state had restored the defendant’s civil rights with respect to a prior conviction by issuance of a certificate, and (2) the certificate did not expressly contain a restriction pertaining to firearms, the prior conviction may not be used as a predicate offense under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 *102 U.S.C. § 924. 2 Here, even if this court were to agree with Gonzalez that Gallagher applies, Gonzalez’s argument fails because both certificates on Gonzalez included the following disclaimer: “The issuance of this Certificate of Discharge does not restore to the above captioned individual his/her right to bear arms.” We conclude that a state certificate which merely reinstates a former prisoner’s civil rights does not prevent the conviction from being counted under section 4B1.1(a). See U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.2 n. 3, 4A1.2 n. 10. Accordingly, we affirm.