Michael Hubbard appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude the district court considered the relevant sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000) (referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors to consider in revoking supervised release), and did not abuse its discretion by imposing a sentence above the suggested Guidelines range, see United States v. Shepard, 329 F.3d 619, 621 (8th Cir. 2003); United States v. Shaw, 180 F.3d 920, 923 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.