Melvin Avery Warren v. Dept. of Veterans
Melvin Avery Warren v. Dept. of Veterans
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Melvin Avery Warren, Sr., a former employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), brought an action claiming that the VA discriminated against him when it fired him during his probationary period. Mr. Warren moved for entry of default, and the VA moved for dismissal or summary judgment. The district court 1 held that Mr. Warren’s action was barred because he had not timely exhausted his administrative remedies, and that he was not entitled to default judgment. Mr. Warren appeals.
Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree that Mr. *593 Warren’s complaint was time barred as he did not exhaust his administrative remedies by timely pursuing his administrative complaint, see 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.105, 1614.106; Jensen v. Henderson, 315 F.3d 854, 859 (8th Cir. 2002), and thus he was not entitled to entry of default, see Fed. R.Civ.P. 55(e) (no judgment by default shall be entered against United States agency unless claimant establishes claim or right to relief by evidence satisfactory to court). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.