Plaintiff Missouri Child Care Association (MCCA), the prevailing party in this civil rights case, appeals the order of the District Court 1 awarding attorney fees to MCCA. MCCA argues that the court abused its discretion by reducing MCCA’s claim for attorney fees by sixty percent. The District Court’s reason for this downward adjustment of the lodestar amount was that MCCA, though it had succeeded in changing the legal relationship between the parties, had achieved only limited success. More specifically, the court reasoned that MCCA had obtained both declaratory and injunctive relief, but that these forms of relief did not ipso facto assure any increases in reimbursements to the foster-care providers who are MCCA’s members. Given MCCA’s real but limited success, the court found that a sixty percent reduction of the lodestar amount was reasonable.

A plaintiff’s limited success is a legitimate reason to reduce a requested fee amount. See Polacco v. Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 37 F.3d 366, 370 (8th Cir. 1994). Having considered all of MCCA’s arguments in support of its claim that its success was complete, not limited, and that the requested amount of attorney fees should be awarded in full, we find those arguments unpersuasive. In the circumstances of this case, we cannot say the District Court’s fee award was an abuse of its discretion.

The order of the District Court is affirmed.