Thomas Watson appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing, for failure to state a claim, his civil action against his former state public defender. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons the district court stated. See Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 312, 324-25, 102 S.Ct. 445, 70 L.Ed.2d 509 (1981) (public defenders performing traditional functions as counsel are not state actors); Dace v. Mickelson, 816 F.2d 1277, 1280-81 (8th Cir. 1987) (no liberty interest in conditional release unless interest is created by state statute); Johnson v. Missouri Bd. ofProb. & Parole, 92 S.W.3d 107, 113-114 (Mo. App. 2002) (Missouri does not by statute create liberty interest in conditional release).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.