United States v. Norman E. Van Zee
United States v. Norman E. Van Zee
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3640 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota.
Norman Eugene Van Zee, * * Defendant - Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: May 11, 2004 Filed: August 17, 2004 (corrected 8/18/04) ___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BRIGHT and SMITH, Circuit Judges. ___________ LOKEN, Chief Judge.
After the district court1 denied his motion to suppress following an evidentiary hearing, Norman Eugene Van Zee entered a conditional plea of guilty to the charge of possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Van Zee now appeals, arguing that the district court should have suppressed evidence seized during a warrantless search of his vehicle and additional
The HONORABLE LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, adopting the Report and Recommendation of the HONORABLE JOHN E. SIMKO, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.