Joseph D. Thornblad appeals the district court’s 1 preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as barred by Rooker-Feldman. 2 After careful de novo review, see Charchenko v. City of Stillwater, 47 F.3d 981, 982-83 (8th Cir. 1995), we agree with the district court that the action was Rooker-FeldmanA)&rred because Thornblad’s federal complaint raised constitutional challenges already decided by the Minnesota state courts. See Lemonds v. St. Louis County, 222 F.3d 488, 492 (8th Cir. 2000) (except for habeas petitions, lower federal courts lack jurisdiction over attacks on state court judgments), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1183, 121 S.Ct. 1168, 148 L.Ed.2d 1026 (2001); Charchenko, 47 F.3d at 983 (to evaluate whether Rooker-Feldman bars federal suit, federal court must determine what state court held and whether relief requested would void state court ruling or require determining it was wrong).

Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47A(a), except we modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. We also deny Thornblad’s motion for appointment of *611 counsel and motion to retrieve the state court record.