Robert Davis appeals the district court’s 1 decision upholding the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income benefits after a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) and after the Appeals Council denied review. Having reviewed the record, we find that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a *279 whole. See Hilkemeyer v. Barnhart, 380 F.3d 441, 445 (8th Cir. 2004). In particular, the ALJ considered Davis’s impairments in combination, made sufficient credibility findings, considered the side effects of his medications, fully developed the record, adopted a hypothetical posed to the vocational expert which included all of Davis’s limitations that were supported by the record, and considered the disability findings of the Veteran’s Administration in making his decision.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.