U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2004

Dayberry v. Ralston

Dayberry v. Ralston
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided January 8, 2004
84 F. App'x 726

Counsel

Ray J. Baxter, Baxter Law Office, Benton, AR, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Christopher Heil, Brad Hendricks Law Firm, Little Rock, AR, for Intervenor-Appellee., Before RILEY, McMILLIAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Dayberry v. Ralston

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Glynetta Dayberry, personal representative of Justin Todd Dayberry, deceased, appeals the district court’s1 award of *727$3,150 in attorney’s fees to the estate of deceased attorney Buddy Troxell, based on quantum meruit. After careful review, we conclude that the district court made no factual or legal mistakes, or any clear error of judgment in applying the relevant factors, and the award fell within the court’s range of discretion. See Pinfcham v. Camex, Inc., 84 F.3d 292, 294 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (standard of review); Pamida, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc., 281 F.3d 726, 729 (8th Cir. 2002) (defining abuse-of-discretion standard).

Accordingly, we affirm.

. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.