Jessie Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and Johnson’s submissions on appeal, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (de novo re *956 view), we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Johnson failed to allege any violation of his constitutional rights by a state actor and, thus, failed to state a cognizable section 1983 claim. See Kuha v. City of Minnetonka, 365 F.3d 590, 606 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.