Larry Haney appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his motion to expunge his criminal record and its refusal to reconsider the denial. We cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that Haney’s case did not present unusual or exceptional circumstances warranting the extraordinary remedy of expungement, or in declining to reconsider the denial of relief. See Schinzing v. Mid-States Stainless, Inc., 415 F.3d 807, 813 (8th Cir. 2005); Geary v. United States, 901 F.2d 679, 679-80 (8th Cir. 1990); United States v. Bagley, 899 F.2d 707, 708 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 938, 111 S.Ct. 343, 112 L.Ed.2d 307 (1990). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.