Weems v. Timberlands

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Weems v. Timberlands, 123 F. App'x 268 (8th Cir. 2005)

Weems v. Timberlands

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Mark Weems appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. *269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).

Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Mark WEEMS v. Anthony TIMBERLANDS
Status
Published