U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2005

Weems v. Timberlands

Weems v. Timberlands
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided March 11, 2005 · Gruender, McMillian, Melloy
123 F. App'x 268

Weems v. Timberlands

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Mark Weems appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment entered after trial on his Family Medical Leave Act and Americans with Disabilities Act claims, but he did not furnish a trial transcript. See Fed. R.App. P. 10(b)(l)-(2) (appellant’s duty to order transcript). Weems complains about issues that are unreviewable without a transcript. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide complete transcript makes it impossible to review sufficiency of evidence presented at trial), cert. *269denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988).

Because there are no grounds presented for reversal, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Harry F. Barnes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.