Cantrell v. Reed

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Cantrell v. Reed, 123 F. App'x 269 (8th Cir. 2005)

Cantrell v. Reed

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Jimmy Shane Cantrell appeals the district court’s1 pre-service dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We hold dismissal was proper because Mr. Cantrell failed to allege he exhausted his administrative remedies as to his retaliation claim against Director Norris, his claim against Captain Davis, his claim regarding improper inmate classification, and his claim regarding his loss of protective custody status. See Kozohorsky v. Harmon, 332 F.3d 1141, 1143 (8th Cir. 2003) (where multiple prison-conditions claims are brought, administrative remedies must have been exhausted as to all claims).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jimmy Shane CANTRELL v. REED, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC John Does, Official responsible for housing assignments, Cummins Unit, ADC James Byers, Hearing Officer, Cummins Unit, ADC James Gibson, Hearing Officer, Cummins Unit, ADC Kim Luckett, Assistant Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction Evans, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction C. Woods, Classification Officer, Arkansas Department of Correction R. Hobbs, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction Davis, Captain, Arkansas Department of Correction G. Lay, Warden, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
Status
Published