U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2005

United States v. Overcast

United States v. Overcast
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided May 31, 2005
132 F. App'x 677

United States v. Overcast

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

John W. Overcast appeals the sentence the district court* imposed after Overcast pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Overcast has filed two supplemental briefs. We find no merit in any of the arguments raised by Overcast or his counsel.

Having conducted an independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Thus, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.