Ernesto Lara-Valenzuela challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 50 or more grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, and cocaine (amount unspecified), in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 846. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that Lara-Valenzuela’s sentence is unreasonable.

The sentence is not unreasonable. The district court gave Lara-Valenzuela a sentence within the applicable advisory Guidelines range, stated that it had considered the sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and heard argument from counsel regarding Lara-Valenzuela’s criminal history and drug addiction. See United States v. Lincoln, 413 F.3d 716, 717-18 *625 (8th Cir. 2005) (Guidelines sentence based on § 3553(a) factors is presumptively reasonable), cert. denied,— U.S.—, 126 S.Ct. 840, 163 L.Ed.2d 715 (2005) (No. 05-7506).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.