United States v. Bradford Lazarski

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
United States v. Bradford Lazarski, 161 F. App'x 613 (8th Cir. 2006)
Arnold, Fagg, Per Curiam, Smith

United States v. Bradford Lazarski

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bradford Lazarski appeals the sentence imposed after Lazarski pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Lazarski argues the district court * erroneously sentenced him as an armed career criminal, because two of the earlier felony convictions upon which his armed-career-criminal classification was based were not violent felonies. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court correctly determined the felony convictions in questions were violent felonies within the meaning of the relevant statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 924(e); United States v. Sprouse, 394 F.3d 578, 580-81 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v. Sun Bear, 307 F.3d 747, 752-53 (8th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 916, 123 S.Ct. 2275, 156 L.Ed.2d 133 (2003). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Bradford LAZARSKI, Appellant
Status
Unpublished