In this interlocutory appeal, Kareem Farrakhan challenges the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order to enjoin a state court condemnation proceeding. Following careful review of the record, we find that the district court did not abuse its broad discretion in denying the requested injunction. See Manion v. Nagin, 255 F.3d 535, 538 (8th Cir. 2001) (district court has broad discretion when ruling on requests for preliminary injunctions, and court of appeals reverses only for clearly erroneous factual determinations, error of law, or abuse of discretion). Farrakhan’s remaining arguments are meritless. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.