Jerome J. Little II appeals from the district court’s 2 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 conditions of confinement claim. For reversal, Little argues that the clear weight of the evidence does not support the judgment. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that the evidence presented supports the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment on the basis of the district court’s thorough memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.