U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2006

Raymond Johnson v. Michael Kemna

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided June 29, 2006 · Smith, Heaney, Gruender

451 F.3d 938; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16280; 2006 WL 1766616 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Kevin L. Schriener, argued, Clayton, Missouri, for appellant., Ronald S. Ribaudo, argued, Jefferson City, Missouri, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision. The 16 that cite it most often are listed here.

Roberts v. Warden (District Court, D. South Dakota 2025)
Iron Shell v. Warden, Mike Durfee State Prison (District Court, D. South Dakota 2022)
Merrival v. Fluke (District Court, D. South Dakota 2022)
Jogaak v. State of South Dakota (District Court, D. South Dakota 2021)
Harcey v. Fluke (District Court, D. South Dakota 2021)
Fassett v. Young (District Court, D. South Dakota 2021)
Gomez v. Dooley (District Court, D. South Dakota 2021)
Morris v. Fluke (District Court, D. South Dakota 2020)
Arguello v. Ravnsborg (District Court, D. South Dakota 2020)
Borne v. Fluke (District Court, D. South Dakota 2020)
Huntimer v. Young (District Court, D. South Dakota 2019)
Rindahl v. Young (District Court, D. South Dakota 2019)
Tornquist v. Young (District Court, D. South Dakota 2019)
Holtry v. Dooley (District Court, D. South Dakota 2018)
Pasek v. Young (District Court, D. South Dakota 2018)
Pratt v. People of the State of South Dakota (District Court, D. South Dakota 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Raymond Johnson appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The district court dismissed Johnson’s petition as untimely filed, finding that it was filed over one month past the deadline imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

AEDPA requires a state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief to file his federal petition within one year after his state conviction becomes final. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). However, this limitations period does not include the time during which a properly filed application for state post-conviction review is “pending” in state courts. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). The recent decision of this court in Payne v. Kemna, 441 F.3d 570 (8th Cir. 2006), which both parties agree is controlling in this matter, instructs that an application for state post-conviction review, under Missouri law, is pending until the mandate is issued. 441 F.3d at 572. When that date is taken into consideration, there is no dispute that Johnson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus was timely filed before the district court. 1 Accordingly, the district court’s judgment dismissing Johnson’s habeas petition as untimely is reversed, and this case is remanded for further proceedings. See 8th Cir. R. 47(b).

. Considering the 19 days that elapsed between when Johnson's state conviction became final, June 20, 1998, and the date he initiated post-conviction relief proceedings in state court, July 9, 1998, only 358 days passed between the issuance of the mandate on June 2, 2003, and his filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court on May 5, 2004, thus making his petition timely filed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.