U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Hammel

United States v. Hammel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Decided April 17, 2006 · Gruender, Magill, Riley
175 F. App'x 786

United States v. Hammel

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Floyd and Rose Hammel appeal the district court’s1 in rem judgment and decree of foreclosure granting summary judgment in favor of the government. We have carefully reviewed the record and consid*787ered the parties’ arguments, and find no basis for overturning the district court’s well-reasoned opinion. See ARE Sikeston Ltd. P’ship v. Weslock Nat’l, Inc., 120 F.3d 820, 827 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

. The Honorable Edward J. McManus, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.