Scherry Riggins appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination and retaliation suit against her former employer, Pulaski Bank and Trust Company. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Kincaid v. City of Omaha, 378 F.3d 799, 803-04 (8th Cir. 2004) (de novo standard of *636 review), we agree with the district court that Riggins failed to establish that Pulaski Bank’s proffered legitimate, nondiseriminatory reasons for her termination were pretextual. See Gilooly v. Mo. Dep’t of Health & Senior Servs., 421 F.3d 734, 739 (8th Cir. 2005) (burden-shifting analysis).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.