Suleiman Ibrahim appeals from the district court’s 1 order enforcing a settlement agreement between Ibrahim and Metropolitan Transit Authority, arguing that his attorney did not possess authority to enter into the settlement. Upon our careful review of the record, we hold that the district court did not clearly err in concluding that Ibrahim had granted his attorney authority to settle the case and that the settlement agreement therefore bound Ibrahim. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order enforcing the agreement. See 8th Cir. 47B.